Second Amendment is Not About Duck Hunting
2010-04-26 02:42:59 // The Operator
The legislator says: “Quack!”
Would you rather rely upon the police for the protection of your property and your life?
WASHINGTON, June 27 – The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
- Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
New York Times – June 28, 2005
