<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Operator&#8217;s Manual: Operating Axioms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.operator-speaking.com/2008/06/09/operators-manual-operating-axioms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.operator-speaking.com/2008/06/09/operators-manual-operating-axioms/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 09:28:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevan</title>
		<link>http://blog.operator-speaking.com/2008/06/09/operators-manual-operating-axioms/comment-page-1/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>stevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.operator-speaking.com/2008/06/09/operators-manual-operating-axioms/#comment-927</guid>
		<description>&quot;Any ordered social system is necessarily temporary by virtue of its constituent members’longevity and will become imbalanced over time&quot;

- a corporation is also dynamic because of the longevity of its constituents AND, i think, because once the primary product&#039;s goals are achieved (the market is saturated with coke), the drive for maximizing profit potential shifts to other products (coca-cola offers about 400 according to wikipedia). of course, some corps. (like GE or altria [phillip morris]) have their hands in more than light bulbs and tobacco respectively.
i would suggest that social movements follow this pattern to diversify &quot;product&quot;/message (when modest gains are achieved) to include other oppressed parties (i think a decentralized message is detrimental to social reform movements though).
an interesting comparison might be to the evolution of language.

&quot;Distribution of knowledge favors the possessor of knowledge&quot;
- do you have a comprehensive definition of &quot;knowledge&quot; in mind?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any ordered social system is necessarily temporary by virtue of its constituent members’longevity and will become imbalanced over time&#8221;</p>
<p>- a corporation is also dynamic because of the longevity of its constituents AND, i think, because once the primary product&#8217;s goals are achieved (the market is saturated with coke), the drive for maximizing profit potential shifts to other products (coca-cola offers about 400 according to wikipedia). of course, some corps. (like GE or altria [phillip morris]) have their hands in more than light bulbs and tobacco respectively.<br />
i would suggest that social movements follow this pattern to diversify &#8220;product&#8221;/message (when modest gains are achieved) to include other oppressed parties (i think a decentralized message is detrimental to social reform movements though).<br />
an interesting comparison might be to the evolution of language.</p>
<p>&#8220;Distribution of knowledge favors the possessor of knowledge&#8221;<br />
- do you have a comprehensive definition of &#8220;knowledge&#8221; in mind?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: blog.operator-speaking.com @ 2012-05-19 16:18:53 -->
